Key Takeaways from the DVRPC E-Micromobility Summit

March 4, 2024

The DVRPC E-Micromobility Summit explored the latest developments and challenges in the rapidly evolving e-micromobility landscape. Read notable takeaways from the event.

DVRPC’s E-Micromobility Summit on February 8, 2024, brought together national and regional experts, local planners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to explore the latest developments and challenges in the rapidly evolving e-micromobility landscape. E-micromobility includes small electrically-driven devices, such as e-bikes and e-scooters. The Summit provided an overview of design principles to consider when planning for e-micromobility, before shifting into a panel discussion of what is known and unknown about how e-micromobility is shaping the future of sustainable transportation. Jean Crowther, Principal at Alta Planning + Design, provided opening remarks. Panelists included Indego Bikeshare’s Planning Manager Laura Culp, Director of Transportation Planning for Asbury Park James Bonanno, and Director of Design and Construction for the Delaware River Waterfront Corporation Christopher R. Dougherty. The panel discussion was moderated by Emilia Crotty, the Director of Trails and Equitable Access for Pennsylvania Environmental Council. 

Here are notable takeaways on shaping e-micromobility infrastructure, culture, and perception:

Designing For Desired User Behavior: Keynote speaker Jean Crowther emphasized the importance of designing for desired user behavior both on-street and on trails. Crowther highlighted the negative impact of restricting e-micromobility modes, stating that eliminating such options could limit potential transportation choices, reducing access to employment and services and raising equity concerns.

Legal Considerations: One significant takeaway was the importance for more widespread  understanding of the legal status of e-micromobility devices and use, which varies between the two states comprising DVRPC’s service area. The discussions stressed the importance of clear regulations to provide a framework for the operation and integration of e-micromobility vehicles into urban, suburban, and rural transportation systems. Panelists shared that policies should focus on solving underlying problems, such as speeding, rather than restricting certain e-micromobility devices.

Traffic Safety Barrier: The Summit emphasized traffic safety as a big barrier to widespread e-micromobility adoption. Laura Culp highlighted that Philadelphia’s official bikeshare program recorded its highest ridership numbers when roads were closed to vehicular traffic during the Pope's visit in 2015, showcasing the potential for widespread adoption of e-micromobility if users were provided dedicated infrastructure separated from motorists. 

Filling Transportation Gaps: E-micromobility was identified as a solution for filling gaps in the existing transportation system. The flexibility and accessibility of e-micromobility vehicles were acknowledged as vital components in addressing first- and last-mile connectivity challenges and enhancing overall mobility, especially for workers with overnight shifts or non-traditional hours.

Interest, Research, and Data Needs: The Summit generated considerable interest in the potential of e-micromobility. However, it also highlighted the need for more research and data to further understand user behavior, safety implications, and the overall impact on urban, suburban, and rural transportation systems. Participants expressed a collective interest in fostering a knowledge base to inform future decisions and policy developments.

In conclusion, the E-Micromobility Summit was a helpful platform for discussions of infrastructure, culture, and safety, steering the conversation toward creating a sustainable and inclusive future for e-micromobility in a variety of environments across the DVRPC region.

If you were unable to attend the E-Micromobility Summit, you can view a recording.